Category Archives: social

A Muslim ‘reformer’ killed in Pakistan for saying non-Muslim men should be allowed to marry Muslim women !

Simple commonsense says, then, that Muslim women in Pakistan are not allowed to marry non-Muslim men while Muslim men can marry non-Muslim women and raise their children as Muslims. Its so because it is stipulated by Koran and Islamic Law ( Sharia Law ).

The news report reads : “Unidentified gunmen on Thursday shot dead a professor of Islamic studies in Pakistan who had faced accusations of blasphemy and threats from colleagues over his moderate views, police said……..Among the articles the 54-year-old had written was one arguing that Muslim women should be allowed to marry non-Muslim men, the colleague said.”  ( HERE )’s director Robert Spencer observes : ” ( HIS ) crime was saying that non-Muslim men should be able to marry Muslim women — a challenge to the supremacist Islamic law that endeavors to ensure that Muslim communities will always be growing and non-Muslim communities will always be in decline. ”

I still remember reading, in the past, that ‘secular’ Ram Vilas Paswan and other secularists accusing RSS and BJP of fascism on their assumption that BJP and RSS oppose Hindu girls marrying Muslim men ! Then, on the similar lines of logic and reason, Islam must be fascist ! And it is. And this social humiliation of non-Muslims is one of many humiliations imposed on non-Muslims living under Islamic law under the contract Dhimma .

Recently, article after article in media ridiculed Hindus over ‘reported or alleged’ existing LOVE JIHAD. The writers, mostly Hindus – going by their name, in displaying their liberal and secular credentials, degenerated to such low levels that they kept headlines like ‘ Hindu woman’s body as battle ground for Hindu right wing ‘ and accused Hindu men for misogyny to  suffering under inferiority complex ( as they are feeling humiliation that Hindu women are choosing Muslim men – this is what wrote ).  Infact, media after media competed with each other in making satire s out of ‘LOVE JIHAD’. Its clear from reading these articles that they were not interested in any honest discussion or debate as they mouthed cheap rhetoric e.g wrote, ‘But like all great urban myths the Love Jihad persists. It persists because the bodies of women can prove to be a far more potent polarizing and organizing tool than even a Ram Temple.’  The standing belief among these ‘progressives’ is that the more they ridicule Hindus esp. Hindu men better their credentials as secular-liberalists established.  And these articles are also mean to foster self-loathing among young Hindus and in time, they too eventually suffer from the syndrome of seeing self-loathing as a sign of progressiveness and liberal and secular credentials.

Perhaps, what these intellectuals, there is hardly any intelligence in them though, do not realize is that the more ridiculous things they say about Hindu men and LOVE JIHAD, the more they expose Islam’s fascist leanings. If Hindus, i.e. Hindu men or Hindu right wing, oppose those Hindu-Muslim marriages, it only speaks about those right wing organizations . But Islam prohibiting such marriages and imposing such restrictions on its women while passing such privileges to Muslim men is based at the very ground level in the sense that these rules and regulations are mentioned in Koran. WHO COULD TELL THESE ‘PROGRESSIVES’ AND ‘LIBERALS’ THAT WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT HINDU RIGHT WING APPLIES TO THE WHOLE ISLAM AND THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY ? And of course, media can never mention this double standard of Islam and its fascist implications, just like it can not report about Hindu boys getting killed just because they were in love with Muslim girls. Just feel this : To buttress India as secular and plural, media has to resort to so much censoring, twisting and concealing the truth about Islam and Muslims ?


Hindu Muslim inter-religious marriages (9): A Hindu guy killed for marrying a Muslim girl

This did not happen in Pakistan or Bangladesh, and of course, to think a Non-Muslim guy can marry a Muslim girl in any Islamic country is an indication of ones ignorance of Islam and its beliefs, Jihad and apartheid ‘Dhimmah’.

This is how Asian Age reports: Man murdered for marrying Muslim girl

See that. Will it be on similar line if a Muslims guy was killed?

How many media entities reported on this and subsequent violence? I do not know but what I know is the whole media along with ‘secular !’ Muslim community leaders – and secular Hindu politicians – would have made a huge issue if the victim was a Muslim and the girl was a Hindu. Remember all that 24 hour live coverage of Rizwanur-Todi incident in Calcutta, a singular event which changed political equations in West Bengal.

Marriage law in Islam: Islam allows Muslim men marrying Non-Muslim women and bring their offspring as Muslims. But it strictly prohibits Muslim women marrying Non-Muslim men. According to existing social customs and traditions, a man takes his wife into his own household, but not vice versa.  The prohibition of Muslim women marrying non-Muslim men and the allowance of Muslim men marrying non-Muslim women  results in means the population of Muslims will be in a position always to grow, while that of non-Muslims declines. Considering that woman is at the center of pro-creation, it will have double effect in the same period: increases no. of Muslims, at the same time with decreasing no. of Non-Muslims.

Every law and belief in Islam is rigged to expand the dominion of Islam. Double standards, like the above one, become norms, albeit in the name of piety, while larger moral issues, reciprocity, are simply brushed aside.

It is worth recalling that Islam prescribes death penalty to those Muslims who leave Islam and bans other religions from proselytizing but, it asks its followers to convert Non-Muslims through any means, from proselytizing to forcing.

Sharia law stipulates that those Non-Muslim men who marry Muslim women shall be put to death. And here,  Muslims killing that guy is in pure line with beliefs of Muslims and Islamic law. And it is meant to serve as a warning to Non-Muslims and to Muslim women.

Since, Muslims are in minority in India, the Muslim girl herself could have been a victim for marrying Non-Muslim guy, as Islam ( Koran) supports honor killings; I presented such cases where in Muslim girls were killed for marrying Non-Muslims.

A 24-year old man was hacked to death allegedly by the brother of a Muslim girl and his associates for marrying her, triggering tension in Idalakudi area of the district, police said.

Ramesh, a goods carrier operator based here, had married the girl belonging to Idalakudi some months ago though her family had opposed it, they said.

On June 14, two persons had stopped Ramesh’s vehicle and taken him to Idalakudi where a seven-member gang including the brother of his wife attacked him with iron rods, police said, adding he succumbed to injuries at a hospital yesterday.

As the news of his death spread, a group indulged in stone pelting in some localities in the area while some people blocked traffic to protest the violence, they said. Police rushed to the spot and dispersed both the groups.


Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages ( 1 )

Note: One can also watch Hindu-Muslim inter religious marriages! (Video).

What is presented here, in this post, is based on what I read on the net in the past, about, 15 months. Of course this will not make any difference to such people (Hindu girls or Non Muslim girls) in such circumstances already; after all who has time these days to inquire about anything objectively. Or more importantly I am not questioning any body’s freedom esp.women to take decisions regarding their life. This post is like a gentle warning about Islam. So, if some fiery Hindu feminist woman comes across this post, cool your self before you comment, if you feel like, and share your opinion.

These days, we just keep making our life decisions based on one minute digital bytes we keep hearing from media. Or influenced by Bollywood which is not very different from Muslim mafia, but nevertheless glorified by media shamelessly; then media itself has lost its value. Many journos working in media can not even distinguish western-ism from modernism. It can not even distinguish good from evil. Continue reading →